Windfury Crits

Enhancement Shaman PVE and PVP. As a Tier 7 Enhancement Shaman, avid PvPer and guild leader I find there are not enough active Enhance blogs. Thus, *Windfury Crits* the Enhancement Shaman blog covering PvE, PvP, and pretty much everything else I can think of relating to the wonderful world of enhance.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

EnhSim Results, and Other Findings

I've been running EnhSim playing out different variables. My limitation is that I am really only running it in Enhancement gear so I can't test results against pure Ele gear or a mix of Ele and Enhance. I do have some good findings though just from my pure Enhance gear setup. All tests were based off the 8/53/0 spec with Imp Shields instead of Imp Ghostwolf.

Across the board Slow/Slow beat out Slow/Fast regardless of enchants or spell rotations. Slow/Fast was usually around 50 DPS lower than Slow/Slow. I suspect this is due to my current gear setup, so I would be interested to know if anyone ran tests in mixed gear to see if the spell damage coefficient kicks in and makes up for the OH-eaten WF procs.

Result 1: Slow/Slow we go! I'm definitely relieved that I don't have to rush out and find a decent fast OH weapon.

Next, spells. There are five possible spells we can use in our rotation now:
  1. FS - Flame Shock
  2. SS - Stormstrike
  3. ES - Earth Shock
  4. LL - Lava Lash
  5. MW5_LB - Maelstrom Weapon 5 point Lightning Bolt (aka instant)
I tested 192 different simulations. First I used a WF/FT setup I ran all 96 possible combinations of FS, SS, LL, and MW5_LB while keeping ES last. Then I switched to WF/WF and ran all 96 possible combinations of FS, SS, ES, and MW5_LB while keeping LL last.

Running these tests while fully raid buffed in Enhancement gear using Slow/Slow weapons I found that WF/WF edged out WF/FT.
Average DPS for WF/FT across all rotations: 1911
Average DPS for WF/WF across all rotations: 1936

Result 2: WF/WF ftw!

It would seem things haven't really changed, just that I'm now kicking out a helluva a lot more damage. But again, I come back to the fact that it may be heavily gear dependent.

As for a priority of spells, it's a tough call but let's say I'm in the middle of a fight and all of my CD's are up at once and I have 5 procs of MW built up, what do I do? I Flame Shock. FS does on average more damage than the other spells. It's close, but the DoT makes the difference. The next best spell is MW5_LB, followed by ES and then SS. Really, it's splitting hairs. I could mash all five of my spells and still come up with 1930 DPS.

Result 3: Roll Face Leftwards Across Keyboard to Maximize DPS

Well, maybe not to that extreme...

Labels: , ,

4 Comments:

  • At October 15, 2008 3:51 PM , Blogger Rich said...

    I'm going to cry.
    I just realized I ran every single one of those 192 simulations with my weapon speeds set to 2.60 when in reality mine are 2.50.

    Now the question is, do I run those tests all over again or just assume the results are going to be similar?

    *sigh*

     
  • At October 16, 2008 12:53 AM , Anonymous Demtee said...

    faster weapons = more hits and flametongue hits, still cd on WF.
    ive had good results with 2x 2.6 with 11.10 passive haste and WF/FT

    plx run it over!

    will wws tomorrows ajustment run and post link!

     
  • At October 16, 2008 1:07 AM , Anonymous Demtee said...

    did u use flametongue glyph while doing the WF/FT test?

     
  • At October 16, 2008 9:10 AM , Blogger Rich said...

    I did not use any glyphs in the tests. I think that I'll redo the tests this morning with the glyphs and the weapon speeds accurate representing my weapons (the Vanir fist weapons).

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home